Wattle & Daub: Craft, Conservation & Wiltshire Case Study
Contents 2 History
3 Craft
3.3 Panel Types
3.4 Staves
3.6 Daub
3.7 Decoration
4.1 Soils
4.1.1 Constituents
4.1.2 Plasticity
4.1.3 Strength
4.1.4 Field Testing
4.1.5 Selection
4.2 Dung
4.2.2 Lignin
4.2.3 Urine
4.2.4 Microbial Debris
4.2.5 The Role of Dung
4.3 Fibre
5.2.3 Maintenance
5.3 Repair
5.3.1 Partial Renewal
5.4 Replacement
5.4.1 Brick Infill
5.4.2 Renewal
6.3 Fieldwork
6.5 Evaluation
|
5 ConservationThe archaeology of timber-framing has been extensively
studied by architectural historians as antiquities important to the English
landscape and our social history. However, with the evolution of conservation
ethics throughout the twentieth century, we have now arrived at a situation
where the great knowledge of timber-framing is disproportionately great against
the scant knowledge of the wattle and daub panels that wee used to transform
every frame into
walling.[74]
The relatively recent development and recognition of the buildings archaeologist
has partly addressed this imbalance, yet our understanding of wattle and daub is
mediocre in comparison. This is disappointing since it has been claimed that,
‘wattle and daub often contains more archaeological evidence than the
timber
frame’.[75]
For example, Rackham (1994) has found that withies are often, ‘excellently
preserved, down to the very lichens which grew on the rods when they were
alive’. Additionally, the blackened surface of daub may provide evidence
of an open hearth, the location of a smoke-bay or the remnants of a smoke
hood.
|